> o pm2e here with Solaris 2.5.1 which had Assigned Address
> 192.9.200.101 for pm2e
That's an interesting OS for a Portmaster. Might you mean ComOS 3.5.1 ?
> o Changed the Assigned Address: 10.0.0.9
Do you really want to assign private, non-routable addresses to your users?
Starting with x.x.x.9?
Is this PM-2E behind a NAT router or firewall?
> o Still Using namesvc NIS
>
> o Default Host, Name Server, RADIUS Server, Accounting Server
> all set to 10.0.0.11
Do you have those servers with those addresses on your network? This
will conflict with the assigned pool (which really seems to be quite
wrong).
> Q:
> o What should the Interface Address be set?
What address are you assigning to this Portmaster's ethernet? 192.9.200.101?
> o What should the Netmask be set?
The same as the netmask of the other hosts on the network.
> o What should be the Broadcast Address be set?
Generally, the highest address on the local network. Or the word "high".
> o What should the IP Gateway be set?
The address of your next hop to the net.
> o Routes?
Often a good idea.
> Previously before could ping 10.0.0.11 and users could login in
> -- but *not* now
>
> I can phone-in via modem to the pm2, and change things as !root --
> but I can't seem to reach 10.0.0.11 thru the pm2e
>
> Any help in dead of nite appreciated :)>>
The nature of your questions leads one to believe that you may be in this
situation over your head. Any documentation available from which you can
put it back the way it was? Why were these changes made? Anyone within
your company who has recent experience configuring routers and terminal
servers, and understands the topology of your network?
-- Jay Hennigan jay@west.net --
WestNet: Internet service to Santa Barbara, Ventura and the world.
805-892-2700 805-289-1000 805-578-2121
-
To unsubscribe, email 'majordomo@livingston.com' with
'unsubscribe portmaster-users' in the body of the message.