RE: (PM) Re: For those who like numbers and graphs - New LANQuest test

Stephen M. Milton (milton@isomedia.com)
Tue, 13 Jan 1998 15:47:58 -0800

IANASE (I Am Not A Switch Engineer) but I am betting that their PBX switch
emulator was only good for a single T-1/PRI

-Steve

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-portmaster-users@livingston.com
> [mailto:owner-portmaster-users@livingston.com]On Behalf Of Jonah
> Yokubaitis
> Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 1998 11:28 AM
> To: inet-access@earth.com
> Cc: portmaster-users@livingston.com
> Subject: (PM) Re: For those who like numbers and graphs - New LANQuest
> test
>
>
> On Tue, 13 Jan 1998, MegaZone wrote:
>
> |LANQuest tested the PM-3 against the MAX 4048 and 3Com Total Control.
> |
>
|<URL:http://www.livingston.com/Marketing/Products/lanquest_benchmark.shtml>
>
> Nice results. Shows the solid architecture of the PM3. My question is
> why didn't Lanquest test all 48ports?
>
> Jonah
>
> Jonah Barron Yokubaitis | Austin|San Antonio|Houston
> President | Dallas|Fort Worth|Boerne
> Texas.Net | Georgetown|Dripping Springs
> http://www.texas.net | Making 56k affordable
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, email 'majordomo@livingston.com' with
> 'unsubscribe portmaster-users' in the body of the message.
>

-
To unsubscribe, email 'majordomo@livingston.com' with
'unsubscribe portmaster-users' in the body of the message.