Re: (PM) Netstats not good

R Gibbons (rkg@empirenet.com)
Sat, 8 Nov 1997 14:20:08 -0800 (PST)

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Alexander Blauvelt: "(PM) Choicenet, RadiusNT and Pormasters"
Previous message: Tom: "Re: (PM) OR-U: no default route to learned IP address? (fwd)"
In reply to: Ron Parker: "Re: (PM) Netstats not good"

Up until about a month ago we were seeing several hundred
Ierrs/day many Resets and about 5-7% Collisions on all (7)
of our Portmasters. We installed a 3Com Hub for about a week
but nothing changed. We replaced the hub with a Bay 350T
switch and we are seeing at most 1-2 Ierrs/day (most are 0) about .1%
collisions and no Resets. The Bay switch is a really good box and
runs about $2100. I think Bay is offering a $25/port rebate.

Regards,
Rich Gibbons
EmpireNet Inc.

On Fri, 7 Nov 1997, David Edwards wrote:

> Hello,
>
> Just noticed that my netstats on my PM3 aren't looking too good. Guess I'm
> starting to pump too much through the hub I have. Would you agree?
>
> pm3> sho netstat
> Name Ipkts Ierrs Opkts Oerrs Collis Resets Queue
> ether0 976272 1796 1011842 3 573189 8 0
>
> Would you think its time for a switch instead of the hub I have now?
> Any recommendations on low cost - high performance switches?
>

-
To unsubscribe, email 'majordomo@livingston.com' with
'unsubscribe portmaster-users' in the body of the message.

Next message: Alexander Blauvelt: "(PM) Choicenet, RadiusNT and Pormasters"
Previous message: Tom: "Re: (PM) OR-U: no default route to learned IP address? (fwd)"
In reply to: Ron Parker: "Re: (PM) Netstats not good"