Re: (PM) OR-U: no default route to learned IP address?

Tom (tom@sdf.com)
Fri, 7 Nov 1997 18:17:38 -0800 (PST)

On Fri, 7 Nov 1997, Jake Messinger wrote:

> On Fri, 7 Nov 1997, Tom wrote:
>
> > > Why not just have RIP or OSPF (Livingston, unlike Ascend's Pipelines
> > > understands OSPF) pass a default route to the connection? I wouldn't want
> >
> > No, the OR-U doesn't understand OSPF either. I find it amusing that you
> > suggest this, as this is well known limitation.
>
> ???????? OR-U's do NOT understand OSPF ????????

Not over ISDN. It only does it over ether0, which is rather useless for
the SOHO situation.

> ~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~
> Jake Messinger 713-772-6690 jake@ams.com
> Advanced Medical Systems, Inc. jake@uh.edu
> 8300 Bissonnet #400 fax: 713-774-3498
> Houston, Texas 77074 http://www.ams.com/~jake
> ~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~
>
>
>

Tom

-
To unsubscribe, email 'majordomo@livingston.com' with
'unsubscribe portmaster-users' in the body of the message.