> On Fri, 7 Nov 1997, Tom wrote:
>
> >
> >On Fri, 7 Nov 1997, Stephen Zedalis wrote:
> >
> >> On Fri, 7 Nov 1997, John Kelly wrote:
> >>
> >> >I was considering an OR-U until I read this. Someone else posted
> >> >on the list how some competitive routers were brain dead, but this
> >> >limitation seems brain dead to me.
> >>
> >> Why not just have RIP or OSPF (Livingston, unlike Ascend's Pipelines
> >> understands OSPF) pass a default route to the connection? I wouldn't want
> >
> > No, the OR-U doesn't understand OSPF either. I find it amusing that you
> >suggest this, as this is well known limitation.
>
> Hmmm, I've got 4 of em talking OSPF just fine with ALL my internal
> routes, MD5 passwords, the works, what pray tell do ya mean?
Get just two OR-Us and have one call the other, and send routes.
OSPF just doesn't work over dialup links.
Tom
-
To unsubscribe, email 'majordomo@livingston.com' with
'unsubscribe portmaster-users' in the body of the message.