> Should I go ahead and upgrade to ComOs 3.5 instead of 3.7 in case I need
> to Netboot? Or is it worth the gamble to NOT have a Netboot image for
> 3.7?
Id netboot and upgrade to 3.7.
>
> Why does Livingston offer a ComOs 3.7 without a Netboot image?
I think they get behind. Netbooting is not just a way to bring up broken
portmasters. Some sites do it routinely. So I would think that the netboot
image should be as current as the currently released com os.
> (Actually, on the website they are inconsistent. They specifically tell
> you that ComOs 3.7 is NOT available for Portmaster 2 yet, but it is
> indeed an option to download in the the drop-down box, it's just not
> there in the Netboot image dropdown box, or on the ftp directory
> either).......
As mentioned earlier, I think they get behind in updating all the areas on
their web site so it all jives. I dont think, for example that the latest
windows kit has 3.7 in the data directory. Ill check it out again.
~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~
Jake Messinger 713-772-6690 jake@ams.com
Advanced Medical Systems, Inc. jake@uh.edu
8300 Bissonnet #400
Houston, Texas 77074 http://www.ams.com/~jake
~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~