Thanks by your replay! Thaks any idea or help!!
On Sun, 10 Aug 1997, Jake Messinger wrote:
> On Sat, 9 Aug 1997, Miguel Correia Lima wrote:
> > In my case I beleave that no have problems of routing.
> Yes you do.
OK! Let's go.....
> > All IPs from 200.251.217.129 to 200.251.217.158 are working withou any
> > problem but the ports s20 to s29 do not work ok.
> > > sh route
> > Destination Mask Gateway Source Flag Met Interface
> > ----------------- ---- -------------------- ------- ---- --- ---------
> > 0.0.0.0 0 200.251.217.1 local NS 1 ether0
> > 200.251.217.133 32 200.251.217.133 local HL 1 ptp3
> > 200.251.217.134 32 200.251.217.134 local HL 1 ptp2
> > 200.251.217.135 32 200.251.217.135 local HL 1 ptp5
> > 200.251.217.137 32 200.251.217.137 local HL 1 ptp6
> > 200.251.217.140 32 200.251.217.140 local HL 1 ptp15
> > 200.251.217.141 32 200.251.217.141 local HL 1 ptp16
> > 200.251.217.143 32 200.251.217.143 local HL 1 ptp14
> > 200.251.217.144 32 200.251.217.144 local HL 1 ptp17
> > 200.251.217.146 32 200.251.217.146 local HL 1 ptp7
> > 200.251.217.147 32 200.251.217.147 local HL 1 ptp4
> > 200.251.217.148 32 200.251.217.148 local HL 1 ptp1
> > 200.251.217.149 32 200.251.217.149 local HL 1 ptp18
> > 200.251.217.150 32 200.251.217.150 local HL 1 ptp13
> > 200.251.217.154 32 200.251.217.154 local HL 1 ptp8
> > 200.251.217.156 32 200.251.217.156 local HL 1 ptp9
> > 200.251.217.64 28 200.251.217.65 local NL 1 ptp19
> > 200.251.217.96 27 200.251.217.97 local NL 1 ptpW1
> > 200.251.217.0 24 200.251.217.237 local NL 1 ether0
>
> This last route suggests that there is an entire class C of 200.251.217.0
> on the local ethernet (given the 24 netmask).
OK! I have a Class C in my ethernet!
> This is not a problem because you have routes to each IP.
No! It's dynamic created by PM.
> That is what the H indicates. That it is a HOST.
OK!
> However, that 200.251.217.64 subnet (NL) is not going to get
> any routing because it is in the SAME class C as the local ethernet
> port. Same thing with the Wan port. I dont see how this can be
> working at all as it is.
OK! My network is 200.251.217.0, it's in ether0.
200.251.217.1 ( My Internet Gateway )
+
|
|--+-----------------------+---------| 200.251.217.0 ( my C class)
| +--- 200.251.217.5/32 my pc
+-----------------+
|200.251.217.237/0| <- My PM
+--+------+-------+
| +---> 200.251.217.96/27 other small pop
V
200.251.217.64/28 Small POP
I think this is normal. Let's rip example:
1) In my pc rip say: "who has 200.251.217.67"? ( via ether0 )
my PM say: 200.251.217.237 have! And the route is dynamicly
created.
1) In PM rip say: "who has 200.251.217.67"? ( via ether0 )
my PM say: 200.251.217.237 have! And the route is dynamicly
created too.
I see that it's working because all broadcast an route questions are
solving via ethernet.
BUT! I'm not know if it's the best way to do this configuration.
> You need to subnet your router into its own subnet of the class C that is
> NOT in the same subnet as the remote subnet you are trying to route to.
OK! It isn't in the same subnets. Attention:
PM router: 200.251.217.237 - Last subnet of my class C.
Subnets that I routing: 200.251.217.64/28 and 200.251.217.96/27
> But, I think there are 2 problems here. First, how are the addresses
> supposed to be getting assigned to the s20-29 card?
I'm assing then addesses from 200.251.217.129 plus 30. All this IPs are
free and are unsing in ports S0-218.
> Do you have an address pool? Is it big enough?
No, I don't do this command but, I think that isn't the default,
I'll verify this.
> Do you have the ports set as assigned? Do you have an assigned address?
All IPs are dynamicly used from 200.251.217.219.
> > > > sh all
> > Local Addr: gw-pm03.trian (200.251.217.237) Default Host: 0.0.0.0
> > Gateway: gw-cisco.triang.com.br Netmask: 255.255.255.0
> >
> > gw-pm03> sh ses
> > Port User Host/Inet/Dest Type Dir Status Start Idle
> > ---- --------------- ---------------- ------- --- ------------- ------ ------
> > W1 - gw-pm04.triang.c Netwrk Hrd ESTABLISHED 2days 0
> > S0 - - Netwrk In IDLE 0 0
> > S1 xxxxxxx dial148.triang.c Netwrk In ESTABLISHED 14 0
> > S2 xxxxxxx dial134.triang.c Netwrk In ESTABLISHED 2:02 0
> > S3 xxxxxxx dial133.triang.c Netwrk In ESTABLISHED 1:00 0
> > S4 xxxxxxx dial147.triang.c Netwrk In ESTABLISHED 11 0
> > S5 xxxxxx dial135.triang.c Netwrk In ESTABLISHED 8 0
> > S6 xxxxx dial137.triang.c Netwrk In ESTABLISHED 2:18 0
> > S7 xxxxx dial146.triang.c Netwrk In ESTABLISHED 4:45 0
> > S8 xxxxxxx dial154.triang.c Netwrk In ESTABLISHED 3:28 0
> > S9 xxxxxx dial131.triang.c Netwrk In ESTABLISHED 0 0
> > S10 - - Netwrk In IDLE 0 0
> > S11 - - Netwrk In IDLE 0 0
> > S12 - - Netwrk In IDLE 0 0
> > S13 xxxxxxx dial139.triang.c Netwrk In ESTABLISHED 2 0
> > S14 xxxxxxxx dial143.triang.c Netwrk In ESTABLISHED 1:36 0
> > S15 xxxxxxxx dial140.triang.c Netwrk In ESTABLISHED 47 0
> > S16 xxxxxxx dial141.triang.c Netwrk In ESTABLISHED 1:46 0
> > S17 xxxx dial144.triang.c Netwrk In ESTABLISHED 9 0
> > S18 xxxxx dial130.triang.c Netwrk In ESTABLISHED 6 0
> > S19 - gw-pm02.triang.c Netwrk Hrd ESTABLISHED 2days 0
> > S20 - - Netwrk In IDLE 0 0
> > S21 - - Netwrk In IDLE 0 0
> > S22 - - Netwrk In IDLE 0 0
> > S23 - - Netwrk In IDLE 0 0
> > S24 - - Netwrk In IDLE 0 0
> > S25 - - Netwrk In IDLE 0 0
> > S26 - - Netwrk In IDLE 0 0
> > S27 - - Netwrk In IDLE 0 0
> > S28 - - Netwrk In IDLE 0 0
> > S29 - - Netwrk In IDLE 0 0
--------------------------------
Miguel Correia Lima - Tech. Dep.
Triangulo Internet Provider
Fone/Fax: +55-34-216-4251
E-mail:miguel@triang.com.br
--------------------------------