At 09:35 PM 7/8/97 -0700, Tom Samplonius wrote:
>
>On Tue, 8 Jul 1997, Dale Babiy wrote:
>
>> apple sauce if I can solve this problem :)). The egress is a
Ether
>
> egress? Is Net.Quack lingo now becoming accepted? Gag.... I have
>perhaps spent a thousand dollars on reference materials and have
never
>heard of the term "egress" used in this context, before Net.Quack
used it.
>
> BTW, if you have EVER seen the term "egress" used in a networking
>reference let me know. I have the 3 volume "Internetworking with
TCP/IP"
>by Comer & Stevens (which is on the CCIE reading list), and I don't
see
>this term anywhere.
Oops, didn't mean to start a net.war. No, never read any of
Net.Quack's stuff myself. I do however try to make my plaintive
cries for help a bit different by deliberatly not using dry technical
language. For instance, I doubt that 'Great Packet Trasher In the
Sky is listed in "Internetworking with TCP/IP" ethier :). Egress is
simply a 2$ word for exit.
I don't believe I've ever read through the glossery in Inetnetworking
with TCP/IP actually, so wouldn't know if egress was listed or not.
Sorry again,
Dale Babiy
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP for Personal Privacy 5.0
Charset: noconv
iQA/AwUBM8PIUcKQxEc3JjNXEQJ4bgCg82n4gg87n6A2VWoi4k1gpt8yd/UAoNOo
Ec6ysjqdnAr9+agKC1XU1Xk9
=lxcr
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Dale Babiy, | 'History does not always repeat
Technical Manager, | itself. Sometimes it just
YKnet, | yells, "Can't you remember
Whitehorse, Yukon | anything I told you?" and
(403) 668-8203 o-| lets fly with a club.'
ICQ UIN: 1362909 |
-----------------------------------------------------------------