> There are binaries for in.pmd kicking around that were compiled on
> BSD/OS 2.0 and Linux 1.2.13, respectively, but since they never went
> through a formal beta process (no, I don't know why not), they were
> never authorized for release by Engineering. They're considered
> experimental, unsupported code and can only be given out under special
> circumstances, since Technical Support CANNOT support them should
> anything go wrong.
So your answer is, "No, livingston is not going to compile in.pmd for
Linux?" Why not when you have pmconsole for Linux?
>
> --G.
> --
> 'Twas brillig, and the slithy toves | Benjamin D. Hutchins, texaport minion
> Did gyre and gimble in the wabe: | Livingston Enterprises, Inc.
> All mimsy were the borogoves, | BellNet 800-458-9966 FAX 510-737-2110
> And the mome raths outgrabe. -><- | http://www.livingston.com/ S.I.G.
>
~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~
Jake Messinger 713-772-6690 jake@ams.com
Advanced Medical Systems, Inc. jake@uh.edu
Houston, Texas http://www.ams.com/~jake
~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~
One should not be measured by his/her ascii art ability.