Re: What do the db levels Mean

Kyle Platts (kwplat1@reliant.uswc.uswest.com)
Fri, 25 Apr 97 09:44:04 -0500

>My first CT1 from MCI always had these levels, and my current 3 =
CT1=20
>lines from USWest do too. Should I be complaining to USWest to =
get=20
>these levels raised, or do I need to shorten my cat5 cable run =
from=20
>the current 30 feet to something closer? =20

>Isn't 50 feet the limit? A recent T1 customer had almost 100ft =
of CAT5,
which didn't work, but I finally asked... duh!

No, 16.5 dB is the limit, whatever that works out to be. Shielded =
cable is preferred.

It is actually against tariff to raise levels. Standard T-1 design =
states that you cannot deliver signal to the demarcation point =
greater than 16.5 dB. With the advent of HDSL, most T-1's are =
regenerated at the network interface (the demarcation point). Only =
"standard" T-1 designs (meaning they use standard T-1 signaling =
all the way from the office repeater to the demarcation point) do =
you have to have a repeater less than 3000 feet from the =
demarcation point. When a T-1 leaves the office, it goes through =
an office repeater bay where the signal is regenerated before it =
hits the local loop. Once it is on the exchange cable, there is a =
repeater at 3000 ft and additional repeaters every 6000 ft after =
that until you get to the demarc, where you need a last repeater =
within 3000 ft of the demarc. This ensures a good level to the =
demarc and also makes it possible to do hard wire loopbacks.=20

>Also, could the receive level be contributing to the Lost-Carrier =
problem=20
>people are experiencing (including us: 34.8% when using 3.5.1b11,=20=

>but only 5.1% when using 3.5.1b8)?

Sounds like a stretch to me.

Kyle Platts
CSS-Tech
!NTERPRISE Networking Services