Re: Farallon to Livingston

Jacob Suter (jsuter@intrastar.net)
Wed, 16 Apr 1997 11:32:46 -0500

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: John Storms: "Re: what does this look like?"
Previous message: Richard_R.Moore: "64K data on voice ISDN"
Maybe in reply to: Vikram Khare: "Farallon to Livingston"

> On Tue, 15 Apr 1997, Stephen Fisher wrote:
>
> > It would be very nice if Livingston were to implement NAT.
>
> Just put the Livingston boxes behind a firewall that does NAT and your
all
> set. Once InterNIC starts charging for IP's I'm going to put 192.168.x.y
> on my assigned modem pools and put all my Livingston boxes behind a Linux
> box running IP_MASQ. I actually like this solution better than having
the
> PM do NAT because the linux box can also to web proxy caching et. al.

Contrary to popular belief....

The 'nic doesn't own jack didley squat.

If they start charging for IPs, its gonna be anarchy and overthrow time.

Next message: John Storms: "Re: what does this look like?"
Previous message: Richard_R.Moore: "64K data on voice ISDN"
Maybe in reply to: Vikram Khare: "Farallon to Livingston"