Re: Farallon to Livingston

Matthew S. Crocker (matthew@crocker.com)
Wed, 16 Apr 1997 09:29:17 +0000 (GMT)

On Tue, 15 Apr 1997, Stephen Fisher wrote:

> It would be very nice if Livingston were to implement NAT.

Just put the Livingston boxes behind a firewall that does NAT and your all
set. Once InterNIC starts charging for IP's I'm going to put 192.168.x.y
on my assigned modem pools and put all my Livingston boxes behind a Linux
box running IP_MASQ. I actually like this solution better than having the
PM do NAT because the linux box can also to web proxy caching et. al.

-Matt