Re: Question about PM3

Jaime Bozza (wheelman@nuc.net)
Sun, 13 Apr 1997 11:14:52 -0500 (CDT)

On Sun, 13 Apr 1997, Jeffrey J. Mountin wrote:

> Has anyone using CT1 seen it *not* have m0 with s0, s1 with m1, etc.?

M0 S6 ACTIVE 14400 V42BIS LAPM 39 5 NORMAL
M1 S4 ACTIVE 26400 V42BIS LAPM 18 0 NORMAL
M2 S32 ACTIVE 14400 V42BIS LAPM 26 0 NORMAL
M3 S2 ACTIVE 31200 V42BIS LAPM 19 0 NORMAL
M4 S14 ACTIVE 24000 V42BIS LAPM 39 0 NORMAL
M5 S29 ACTIVE 26400 V42BIS LAPM 23 1 NORMAL
M6 S19 ACTIVE 24000 V42BIS LAPM 1 2 NORMAL
M7 S47 ACTIVE 31200 NONE DIRECT 8 2 NORMAL
M8 S1 ACTIVE 31200 V42BIS LAPM 10 0 NORMAL
M9 S31 ACTIVE 26400 NONE LAPM 26 0 NORMAL
M10 S23 ACTIVE 26400 V42BIS LAPM 17 0 NORMAL
M11 S21 ACTIVE 28800 V42BIS LAPM 9 0 NORMAL
M12 S7 ACTIVE 28800 V42BIS LAPM 4 0 NORMAL

How's that for not being in order? <G>

> Keeps it simple when I want to see what a person is connected at. One step
> more doesn't mean much though.

The modems are used in sequence, from what I can tell. The 'S' ports are
not (At least not in my case) and from everyone's help on the list here,
we've figured out that the 'S' ports correspond to the channel on the CT1
or PRI ... I was more curious about how my CT1's were being used, since
we had an issue with the PM3 deciding to RMB an entire CT1 on me.

Jaime Bozza
Nucleus Communications, Inc.