Re: Announcement of assigned address pool via OSPF (fwd)
Mike Horwath (drechsau@visi.com)
Thu, 10 Apr 1997 01:14:05 -0500 (CDT)
> Once upon a time, MegaZone wrote
> > No, the behavior is deliberate and will not be changed. This was covered,
> > please check the archives since it was a complex issue with a lot of
> > explanation.
> >
> > You do NOT want what you are asking with OSPF - it will make your network
> > crawl as OSPF recalculates every time someone comes on or leaves.
>
> Did you ever find anything out about a PM3 sending data for
> not-connected IPs from the pool to the default gateway instead of
> swallowing them? I still get tons of ICMP redirects from my router
> whenever anyone disconnects accidentally or anything like that.
I haven't finished reading this thread yet...
But, if the IP is not in use on the portmaster, why can't the
portmaster then just return no route to host?
Wouldn't that be easiest?
If you say it already does that, then I must be pretty messed up cause
it doesn't work for me.
--
Mike Horwath IRC: Drechsau LIFE: Lover drechsau@visi.com
Visi: info@visi.com drechsau@Geeks.ORG
Twin Cities area Internet Access: 612-288-0880 for more info
The founding member of Minn. Coalition for Internet Accessibility