Re: ASCEND brain-dead implementation? Or something else (fwd)
Christopher Hicks (chicks@chicks.net)
Thu, 3 Apr 1997 13:10:20 -0500 (EST)
On Thu, 3 Apr 1997, Brian Elfert wrote:
> > Why Farallon when you can use a Livingston Office Router and have the same
> > interface, and the correct behavior.
>
> Does this mean that Farallon routers are really just OEM Livingston stuff?
No.
> I know that Farallon ISDN TAs have just been OEM 3COM Impacts in the past.
At least they stole well, which reminds me......
</chris>
Immature programmers imitate, mature programmers steal.