Re: ASCEND brain-dead implementation? Or something else (fwd)

Brian Elfert (brian@citilink.com)
Thu, 3 Apr 1997 11:18:03 -0600 (CST)

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Jordan Mendelson: "USR Lowers Pricing"
Previous message: John G. Thompson: "Re: PM's for other purposes"
In reply to: Patrick Greenwell: "Re: Excellent Support Story"
Next in thread: Damien T.: "Re: ASCEND brain-dead implementation? Or something else"

On Wed, 2 Apr 1997, MegaZone wrote:

> Why Farallon when you can use a Livingston Office Router and have the same
> interface, and the correct behavior.

Does this mean that Farallon routers are really just OEM Livingston stuff?

I know that Farallon ISDN TAs have just been OEM 3COM Impacts in the past.

Brian

Next message: Jordan Mendelson: "USR Lowers Pricing"
Previous message: John G. Thompson: "Re: PM's for other purposes"
In reply to: Patrick Greenwell: "Re: Excellent Support Story"
Next in thread: Damien T.: "Re: ASCEND brain-dead implementation? Or something else"