Re: Multiple IP's through dial up connection

alexm@agetech.net
Fri, 22 Nov 1996 19:18:26 -0500

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: alexm@agetech.net: "Re: port limit"
Previous message: Bryan Wann_Stigler_ISP: "Re: 2400 baud support? Get real! (fwd)"
Maybe in reply to: Brian Lofurno: "Multiple IP's through dial up connection"

Brian Lofurno wrote:
>
> I have a customer who I am going to route 10 ip's
> to through a dial up account. I think I have the
> radius entry figured out, but was hoping that some
> experts could give it a quick look over. This is
> what I have (am I close?)
>
> User name and password line omited:
>
> User-Service-Type=Framed-User,
> Framed-Protocol=PPP,
> Framed-Address=206.xxx.xxx.213,
> Framed-Netmask=255.255.255.0,
> Framed-Route="206.xxx.xxx.214 206.xxx.xxx.213 1",
> Framed-Route="206.xxx.xxx.215 206.xxx.xxx.213 1",
> Framed-Route="206.xxx.xxx.216 206.xxx.xxx.213 1",
> Framed-Route="206.xxx.xxx.217 206.xxx.xxx.213 1",
> Framed-Route="206.xxx.xxx.218 206.xxx.xxx.213 1",
> Framed-Route="206.xxx.xxx.219 206.xxx.xxx.213 1",
> Framed-Route="206.xxx.xxx.220 206.xxx.xxx.213 1",
> Framed-Route="206.xxx.xxx.221 206.xxx.xxx.213 1",
> Framed-Route="206.xxx.xxx.222 206.xxx.xxx.213 1",
> Framed-Routing=None
>
> So, how does this look? Any corrections would be
> most welcome. Thanks in advance!
> --
> Brian Lofurno
> brian@dplus.net
> DataPlus TrueNet (www.dplus.net)
> 610-429-8300

What I dont understand here is why do you start at 213. A quick look at
my netmask table shows these do not fall under any subnett. Of course it
would work but a bit strange. First of all you dont have to send the
Netmask if that is the default on the ethernet. And you need to space it
like this.
Framed-Route = "206.xxx.xxx.217 206.xxx.xxx.213 1",
^^^^

Next message: alexm@agetech.net: "Re: port limit"
Previous message: Bryan Wann_Stigler_ISP: "Re: 2400 baud support? Get real! (fwd)"
Maybe in reply to: Brian Lofurno: "Multiple IP's through dial up connection"