Re: A Livingston default modem string is bad for a USR modem

Carl Oppedahl (carl@oppedahl.com)
Sun, 10 Nov 1996 13:12:33 -0500

At 12:34 PM 11/10/96 -0500, Stephen B. Henry wrote:

>> This would achieve all of your goals, and would not use up the EEPROM's
>> life. What do you lose by not doing the write to the EEPROM?
>
>Of course, one could always ATTACH to the modem, write the NRAM with the
>correct string ending in &W&W1 and then set the modem string in the PM to
>either ATZ or ATZ1 to get the desired effect.

Yes, this would be better than what the Livingston modem strings do now.