Netscape and PAP (fwd)

Brian 'MegaZone' Bikowicz ((no email))
Thu, 9 Nov 1995 17:51:34 -0800 (PST)

>From megazone Thu Nov 9 17:28:23 1995 remote from server
Received: (from megazone@localhost) by server.livingston.com (8.7.1/8.6.9) id RAA29902 for portmaster-users; Thu, 9 Nov 1995 17:28:23 -0800 (PST)
From: "Brian 'MegaZone' Bikowicz" <megazone>
Message-Id: <199511100128.RAA29902@server.livingston.com>
Subject: HELP! requester address mismatch: 0.0.0.0 ! (fwd)
To: portmaster-users
Date: Thu, 9 Nov 1995 17:28:23 -0800 (PST)
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24]
Content-Type: text
Sender: megazone

Once upon a time Daniel Sully shaped the electrons to say...
>would be greatly appreciated (this might be the 0.0.0.0 bug that has been
>on the list that I havn't read... doh! shoulda.. )

No, it isn't.

>snippet of logfile follows---
>Wed Nov 8 00:49:22 1995: Dropping duplicate: from 206.65.209.2 - ID: 3
>Wed Nov 8 00:49:25 1995: requester address mismatch: 0.0.0.0 != 206.65.209.2
>Wed Nov 8 00:49:25 1995: Authenticate: from 206.65.209.2 - Security
>Breach: steven

You either:
a) haven't made an entry in /etc/raddb/clients (use FQDN BTW), or
b) that name isn't in your DNS.

RADIUS is trying to resolve the name into an IP and then match that
with the request. It isn't being resolved - 0.0.0.0, no match, failure.

-MZ

--
Although I work for Livingston Enterprises Technical Support, I alone am
responsible for everything contained herein.  So don't waste my managers'
time bitching to them if you don't like something I've said.  Flame me.
Phone: 800-458-9966  support@livingston.com  <http://www.livingston.com/> 
FAX: 510-426-8951    6920 Koll Center Parkway #220, Pleasanton, CA 94566