Re: (PM) Netgear RM356

Gerry Dalton (gerry@wts.net)
Tue, 25 May 1999 21:57:35 +0000

We have a RM356 working at one of our sales agent to connect his various
machines into our system. It does a great NAT job and with 3.8.2.c2 is
very solid and fairly quick.

I would not hesitate to use it.

Gerry

At 06:35 AM 5/25/99 -0500, Brian Beaulieu wrote:
>On Tue, May 25, 1999 at 09:29:20AM -0500, Jason A. Cox wrote:
>> Has anyone used a Netgear RM356 (analog modem SOHO LAN router
>> http://netgear.baynetworks.com ) on a client's lan to connect to a PM3? I
>> have a client looking at this router (btw, it only has a single 56K modem
>> connection--no bonding) and I want to know how well it works. Any other
>> suggetions? These little guys are only $250 from buy.com, so if they are
>> any good, I can easily see other company accounts going to LAN dial-up or
>> dedicated low-bandwidth connections.
>
>I can't speak for the RM356 but I can for the RH3x8. They are ISDN routers..
>I have multiple ones dialing into a PM3... I went to these instead of Ascend
>P50's. They're < $300 and rock solid. They work great for office<->office
>solutions too. If the RM356 is anything like the RH3x8 (328 or 348) then I'd
>go for it.
>
>Brian
>--
>UNIX Systems Administrator
>Capital Data, Inc.
>-
>To unsubscribe, email 'majordomo@livingston.com' with
>'unsubscribe portmaster-users' in the body of the message.
>Searchable list archive: <URL:http://www.livingston.com/Tech/archive/>

-
To unsubscribe, email 'majordomo@livingston.com' with
'unsubscribe portmaster-users' in the body of the message.
Searchable list archive: <URL:http://www.livingston.com/Tech/archive/>