Re: (PM) Losing routes

Thomas C Kinnen (tkinnen@livingston.com)
Thu, 20 May 1999 07:58:38 -0700

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Previous message: Roy: "(PM) Losing routes"
Maybe in reply to: Roy: "(PM) Losing routes"

Roy wrote:
>
> We have two customers that are now reporting that their routes are being
> dropped after being connected for 30-40 minutes. The users are on ISDN
> (one with a Pipeline and the other with an Ascend). The routes are
> delivered to the PM-3 (running COMOS 3.8.2c2) using Framed Address or
> Framed Route (doesn't seem to matter).

What does the user entry look like? Also are you using VLSMs? Could
another entry be invalidating the route?

-- 
Thomas C Kinnen - <tkinnen@ra.lucent.com> <tkinnen@sobhrach.com>
[RADIUS Test Engineer] - LUCENT Technologies RABU
"All of the opinions stated above are my own and not my employer's,
unless they were given to me by my employer"
-
To unsubscribe, email 'majordomo@livingston.com' with
'unsubscribe portmaster-users' in the body of the message.
Searchable list archive: <URL:http://www.livingston.com/Tech/archive/>

Previous message: Roy: "(PM) Losing routes"
Maybe in reply to: Roy: "(PM) Losing routes"