> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-portmaster-users@livingston.com
> [mailto:owner-portmaster-users@livingston.com]On Behalf Of Hostmaster
> ViP
> Sent: Tuesday, May 18, 1999 03:21
> To: portmaster-users@livingston.com
> Subject: RE: (PM) RE: (Calculating Telephone Costs)
>
>
> Hello!
>
> We're handeling the 'on demand' calls only like this:
>
> a) We're give the user a fixed IP-Address and a location switched
> to 'on demand'.
> b) The customer is using a router who's capable to do a dialback
> only on D-Channel signaling (which our telco is not charging) itself.
> c) The portmaster is getting the incoming call, authenticate it
> against the location and connects, routing the packets to this
> connection... The call originating from the portmaster is
> disconnected without a real connection... end of story. It works
> with MPPP or pure PPP. We've about a dozend customers who work
> with this configuration...
>
> The problem is, that the time difference between the incoming
> call and the dialback of the router should not be longer than a
> few seconds and the router didn't actual accept the call coming
> in, it has to react only on the D-Channel input. The two brand
> we've found acceptable are Zyxel (Prestige 128 or 100) or
> Shiwa-ISDN-Router, where the Shiva-Routers are not as stable as
> Zyxel.... It SHOULD work with Cisco (7xx, 100x) too, but we've
> never tested it.
>
> mfg
> Martin Wallner (=mw=)
>
> -----
> ViP EDV-Dienstleistungs GesmbH e-mail 'hostmaster@vip.at'
> Domänen-, IP- u. Userwartung ViP RIPE: WM355-RIPE
> Stephensong. 1/4 InterNIC: WM327-ORG
> 1210 Wien Tel. +43 1 257 3317 Fax: Dw. 99
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-portmaster-users@livingston.com
> > [mailto:owner-portmaster-users@livingston.com]On Behalf Of Ralf Naegele
> > Sent: Tuesday, May 18, 1999 3:38 PM
> > To: portmaster-users@livingston.com
> > Subject: (PM) RE:
> >
> >
> > On Thu, 13 May 1999, James Courtier-Dutton wrote:
> >
> > > Date: Thu, 13 May 1999 23:22:05 +0100
> > > From: James Courtier-Dutton <dutton@livingston-ent.co.uk>
> > > To: Ralf Naegele <portmaster@she.de>, portmaster-users@livingston.com
> > > Subject: RE:
> > >
> > > Hello
> > > I don't think the PMs support AOC yet.
> > > Cheers
> > > James
> >
> > it's a pity
> >
> > Ralf
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: owner-portmaster-users@livingston.com
> > > > [mailto:owner-portmaster-users@livingston.com]On Behalf Of
> Ralf Naegele
> > > > Sent: Thursday, May 13, 1999 10:49
> > > > To: portmaster-users@livingston.com
> > > > Subject:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > is there a way to count the telephone units so I can
> calculate the costs
> > > > if the portmaster calls an user? Neither in the raduis log
> nor in the
> > > > syslog I found anything.
> > > >
> > > > Ralf
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > -
> > > > To unsubscribe, email 'majordomo@livingston.com' with
> > > > 'unsubscribe portmaster-users' in the body of the message.
> > > > Searchable list archive:
> <URL:http://www.livingston.com/Tech/archive/>
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> > -
> > To unsubscribe, email 'majordomo@livingston.com' with
> > 'unsubscribe portmaster-users' in the body of the message.
> > Searchable list archive: <URL:http://www.livingston.com/Tech/archive/>
> >
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, email 'majordomo@livingston.com' with
> 'unsubscribe portmaster-users' in the body of the message.
> Searchable list archive: <URL:http://www.livingston.com/Tech/archive/>
>
-
To unsubscribe, email 'majordomo@livingston.com' with
'unsubscribe portmaster-users' in the body of the message.
Searchable list archive: <URL:http://www.livingston.com/Tech/archive/>