. Well, honestly, when I dealt with this I had the default primary on the
. interface and added the private address as the 'alias'. I think the problem
. is that in this case the packets are sent out to the gateway, but have the
. private address in the packet. (BTW I'm not a network geek, so excuse the
. lack of correct terminology) However if you have a specific route set
. up on the proper address it seems to work. EX:
.
. First address (added through ctl panel-network) 209.0.37.98
. With gateway set to 209.0.37.97
.
. This gets the default route set up properly
.
. Second address (added in regedit) 192.168.200.106
Now that's funny, see I thought about that too and figured, fine I'll just
reverse the ips and make the internet ip first in regedit. However I did
that and guess what... none of the rfc1918 addresses routed correctly and
they are all on the same network. For the life of me I couldn't figure
out why...accept for the same reason you mentioned, the packets are being
sent out throught rfc1918 address but with a header from the internet
broadcastable address so they don't get back. Rackin phrackin damn
Winblows, if they could actually implement something correctly once in a
while maybe things would work.
I'm thinking you are right here maybe what I need is a simple proxy
solution on an NT wrsk that will just forward the packets for the stupid
winblows machines as I believe NT handle's ip aliasing correctly (could be
wrong tho). Of course *hint hint* if the beta ComOS for the OR-U wasn't
closed anymore my problems would be solved! <g>
Greg
+(Omni@Dynmc.Net)------------------------------------------------------+
| Dynamic Networking Solutions InterX Technologies |
| Senior Network Administrator bits/keyID 1024/7DF9C285 |
| omni@interx.net omni@itstudio.net omni@undernet.org omni@webpop3.com |
+--------[ DC 50 57 59 C3 76 46 E8 EB 75 A8 94 FE 96 9E D3 ]----------+
-
To unsubscribe, email 'majordomo@livingston.com' with
'unsubscribe portmaster-users' in the body of the message.
Searchable list archive: <URL:http://www.livingston.com/Tech/archive/>