> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-portmaster-users@livingston.com
> [mailto:owner-portmaster-users@livingston.com]On Behalf Of Michael Bryan
> Sent: Friday, May 07, 1999 07:29
> To: jake@ams.com
> Cc: portmaster-users@livingston.com
> Subject: Re: (PM) Supernet giving some strange results...
>
>
>
>
> On 5/7/99 at 1:08 PM Jake Messinger wrote:
>
> >On Fri, 7 May 1999, IOC Systems Administrator wrote:
> >
> >:The problem is that one of the portmaster IP pools span the
> area where the
> >:two networks meet and the result is that people who are assigned the
> >:addresses of 207.87.254.255 and 207.87.255.0 have problems:
> >
> >Set the poolsizes so they dont collide. But that brings up something. How
> >would you set a common poolsize and pool ip among a group of pm 3s?
>
> His pools are not colliding. He has something like this:
>
>
> PM3#1: 207.87.254.188 - 207.87.254.233
> PM3#2: 207.87.254.234 - 207.87.255.23
> PM3#3: 207.87.255.24 - 207.87.255.69
>
> In this example, PM3#2 has a pool that includes 207.87.254.255
> and 207.87.255.0.
>
> Personally, I'd just rework the pools assigned, and make sure no
> pool includes
> those problematic addresses.
>
>
> Michael Bryan
> pmu@ursine.com
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, email 'majordomo@livingston.com' with
> 'unsubscribe portmaster-users' in the body of the message.
> Searchable list archive: <URL:http://www.livingston.com/Tech/archive/>
>
>
-
To unsubscribe, email 'majordomo@livingston.com' with
'unsubscribe portmaster-users' in the body of the message.
Searchable list archive: <URL:http://www.livingston.com/Tech/archive/>