Did the same thing here a few months ago. I just made sure that those
ranges were not used. I stuck the extra reouters, etc, in that space...
JOhn:}
At 12:33 PM 5/7/99 -0400, you wrote:
>Hi all,
>
>I've just finished supernetting two Class Cs (207.87.254.0 - 207.87.255.255,
>NM: 255.255.254.0) to accommodate up to 10 PM3s and some spare IPs for
>routers, servers, etc...
>
>The problem is that one of the portmaster IP pools span the area where the
>two networks meet and the result is that people who are assigned the
>addresses of 207.87.254.255 and 207.87.255.0 have problems;
>
>207.87.254.255 can't ping the PM3 or the router.
>207.87.255.0 CAN ping the PM3, but can't ping the router.
>There are no filters set up for the account being tested.
>
>I'm sure these addresses will cause problems in other regards... is there a
>way to make the PM3 not assign these numbers other than reassigning the
>pools so that it doesn't cross the boundary?
>
>PS: It's a fairly simple network and we're using static routing on the core
>router.
>
>Bob Nichols
>Systems Administrator,
>IOCnet / Internet Of Concord
>sysadmin@iocnet.net
>
>
>
>-
>To unsubscribe, email 'majordomo@livingston.com' with
>'unsubscribe portmaster-users' in the body of the message.
>Searchable list archive: <URL:http://www.livingston.com/Tech/archive/>
John C. Lange, Sr. PALACE dot NET, INC.
microjl@palacenet.net MICRO-TECH Computers, Inc.
608.742.1601 & 6980 1819 New Pinery Road
http://www.palacenet.net/ Portage, WI 53901
MSCE Training for only $150.00 - http://dpec.palacenet.net/
Authorized iPSwitch WebVar @ http://www.microt.com/iPSwitch/
--- __o
--- _-\<,_ Fastest Service in Town
--- (_)/ (_)
-
To unsubscribe, email 'majordomo@livingston.com' with
'unsubscribe portmaster-users' in the body of the message.
Searchable list archive: <URL:http://www.livingston.com/Tech/archive/>