Re: (PM) NFAS 3.9 and Lastcall

Terry Berg (tberg@livingston.com)
Thu, 06 May 1999 12:09:21 -0700

Scott,

Setting a modem to last call doesn't have anything to do with the lines at
all, it merely turns a modem off and prevents it from answering any more
calls. The trunk(DS0) is not effected, therefore the answer would be that
it would not force the telco to rollover to the next portmaster in the hunt
group.

Terry

At 02:16 PM 5/6/99 -0400, Scott Silzer wrote:
>Sorry some of the message was cut off.
>
>What I was thinking is that if they share a D channel then if there was no
>modem ready in the first rack then the call could be redirected to the next
>PM in the hunt group.
>
>At 2:07 PM -0400 5/6/99, Jake Messinger wrote:
>>On Thu, 6 May 1999, Scott Silzer wrote:
>>
>>:Has any one tried to use last call on a PM using 3.9 and Non Facility
>>:Associated Signaling
>>
>>Hrm, no, but then we dont believe in NFAS. ;-) Why is there some problem? As
>>in, do modems still take calls or something?
>>
>>~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~
>>Jake Messinger, VP. ph:713-772-6690 Lucent Dealer
>>AMS, Inc. fx:713-774-3498 Medical Billing
>>8300 Bissonnet #400 jake@ams.com , ICQ# 4403734 Internet Services
>>Houston, Texas 77074 www.ams.com/~jake and Hardware
>>
>>Adjunct Professor University of Houston, CBA jake@uh.edu
>>~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~
>>
>> INVENTOR OF the _.,-*~''~*-,._ SQUIGGLES (c) 1978
>
>Scott Silzer
>MailTo:scotts@globalserve.net
>GlobalServe Communications
>A Primus Canada Company
>1-888-CITYNET
>-
>To unsubscribe, email 'majordomo@livingston.com' with
>'unsubscribe portmaster-users' in the body of the message.
>Searchable list archive: <URL:http://www.livingston.com/Tech/archive/>
>
>
-
To unsubscribe, email 'majordomo@livingston.com' with
'unsubscribe portmaster-users' in the body of the message.
Searchable list archive: <URL:http://www.livingston.com/Tech/archive/>