Re: (PM) Call Back

Miquel van Smoorenburg (list-portmaster-users@news.cistron.nl)
6 May 1999 20:48:07 +0200

In article <cistron.3731D793.CE3F0A81@livingston.com>,
Thomas C Kinnen <tkinnen@livingston.com> wrote:
>James Courtier-Dutton wrote:
>
>> > On the PortMaster side for Login users you just need to place the Phone
>>
>> Login user dialback does not work for PM3 and PM4, framed users work on
>> both.
>
>There are people using it on a PM3s and it's listed as working for PM4:
>
>http://www.livingston.com/tech/docs/pm4-command/user.html#20294
>http://www.livingston.com/tech/docs/pm4-config/users.html#5702

Why can't the portmaster accept the radius info for a framed callback.
For a framed callback you need to define a location on the PM first, which
completely defeats the purpose of radius.

Also there is a PPP dialback standard now. It's an MS standard, and
only MS supported it at first, but Linux and Cisco have support for it
now as well. W95 and W98 have standard builtin support for this.

I've RFE'd support for radius-based framed-callback and the PPP
support almost 2 years ago. Never heard anything (not even a
"thanks we received your mail").

Mike.

-- 
Indifference will certainly be the downfall of mankind, but who cares?

-- 
The From: and Reply-To: addresses are internal news2mail gateway addresses.
Reply to the list or to miquels@cistron.nl (Miquel van Smoorenburg)
-
To unsubscribe, email 'majordomo@livingston.com' with
'unsubscribe portmaster-users' in the body of the message.
Searchable list archive: <URL:http://www.livingston.com/Tech/archive/>