Re: BACP problem? (Re: (PM) OSPF summaries, E2 vs. E1 type ASE
Miquel van Smoorenburg (list-portmaster-users@news.cistron.nl)
6 May 1999 16:46:50 +0200
In article <cistron.l03130313b35753f0259d@[130.104.10.52]>,
Alain Fontaine (Post master, UCL) <fontaine@sri.ucl.ac.be> wrote:
>À (At) 14:33 +0200 5/05/99, Miquel van Smoorenburg écrivait (wrote) :
>>The only thing that is now missing is that the portmaster will not
>>ever initiate a Callback-Request as far as I can see. It would be
>>nice if this was configurable, eg "set bacp-cb-treshold 90" or so.
>
>The percentage of use can be measured from both ends, so there is no
>value added. Another thing is the detection of a certain amount of
>dropped packets due to congestion. Only the sending end can detect
>this. So maybe "set bacp-cb-dropped 5" (in pps or %) ?
"set bacp-cb-treshold 110" ? :)
Mike.
--
Indifference will certainly be the downfall of mankind, but who cares?
--
The From: and Reply-To: addresses are internal news2mail gateway addresses.
Reply to the list or to miquels@cistron.nl (Miquel van Smoorenburg)
-
To unsubscribe, email 'majordomo@livingston.com' with
'unsubscribe portmaster-users' in the body of the message.
Searchable list archive: <URL:http://www.livingston.com/Tech/archive/>