Re: (PM) OSPF summaries, E2 vs. E1 type ASE OSPF routes

Miquel van Smoorenburg (list-portmaster-users@news.cistron.nl)
5 May 1999 16:28:44 +0200

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Vincent Aniello: "RE: (PM) AT Commands for Error Correction and Compression"
Previous message: Jason A. Cox: "(PM) xDSL and cable modem threat"

In article <cistron.19990505095820.B28535@staff.msen.com>,
Jeff Haas <jmh@mail.msen.com> wrote:
>On Tue, May 04, 1999 at 04:41:43PM -0500, Marc Rouleau wrote:
>> FWIW, we too would love to have a way to summarize OSPF-generated routes.
>> We have to leave OSPF off because ComOS insists on advertising every
>> RADIUS-assigned connected address as a /32.
>
>If its emitting every single one as this, you need to set a poolsize.

He said "RADIUS-assigned". Please read the rest of this thread first.

Mike.

-- Indifference will certainly be the downfall of mankind, but who cares?

-- 
The From: and Reply-To: addresses are internal news2mail gateway addresses.
Reply to the list or to miquels@cistron.nl (Miquel van Smoorenburg)
-
To unsubscribe, email 'majordomo@livingston.com' with
'unsubscribe portmaster-users' in the body of the message.
Searchable list archive: <URL:http://www.livingston.com/Tech/archive/>

Next message: Vincent Aniello: "RE: (PM) AT Commands for Error Correction and Compression"
Previous message: Jason A. Cox: "(PM) xDSL and cable modem threat"