Re: (PM) Limiting modem access to V34+

Thomas Kinnen (tkinnen@livingston.com)
Tue, 04 May 1999 19:44:07 -0700

Tim Tsai wrote:

> On second thought, this is not exactly what I was talking about.
> Doesn't this simply drop the caller if the check item doesn't match (the
> caller attempts to negotiate V.90, for example)?

Yes, I think we are crossing two different threads. The original request was
to block a group of callers from a certian NAS.

> What I want is for the modem to behave like a V.34 (or other configurable
> modem properties) modem based on the called-station ID. This way, one
> could have a V.34 only pool for older or problematic modems.

Currently there is no way to do this.

-- 
Thomas C Kinnen - <tkinnen@ra.lucent.com> <tkinnen@sobhrach.com>
[RADIUS Test Engineer] - LUCENT Technologies RABU
"All of the opinions stated above are my own and not my employer's,
unless they were given to me by my employer"
-
To unsubscribe, email 'majordomo@livingston.com' with
'unsubscribe portmaster-users' in the body of the message.
Searchable list archive: <URL:http://www.livingston.com/Tech/archive/>