> Without NAT it would do you no good, since the remote system would only be
> able to to talk to your PM and nothing else on your network.
This is not true, you can set a netmask for a location and the remote
location can route you any number of ip's based on that.
~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~
Jake Messinger, VP. ph:713-772-6690 Lucent Dealer
AMS, Inc. fx:713-774-3498 Medical Billing
8300 Bissonnet #400 jake@ams.com , ICQ# 4403734 Internet Services
Houston, Texas 77074 www.ams.com/~jake and Hardware
Adjunct Professor University of Houston, CBA jake@uh.edu
~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~
INVENTOR OF the _.,-*~' '~*-,._ SQUIGGLES (c) 1978
-
To unsubscribe, email 'majordomo@livingston.com' with
'unsubscribe portmaster-users' in the body of the message.
Searchable list archive: <URL:http://www.livingston.com/Tech/archive/>