Re: (PM) PM4?

Jake Messinger (jake@ams.com)
Fri, 26 Feb 1999 15:26:13 -0600 (CST)

On Fri, 26 Feb 1999, Jeff Haas wrote:

> its effective life for additional features. Multiple IP pools,

Grr! THe max 4000 has had that for quite some time, and it is the same
platform. Even the 1800 has multi ip pools.

> which were requested ages ago, will only be added to the PM4. VoIP,
> ATM, DS3, etc. will only exist on the PM4. Lucent (not Livingston)
> at least insisted that RIPv2 get developed.

Say it isnt so!

> I am sorely disappointed with several things about the PM4:

All those but the PRIMARY factor for me is the fact that no matter how
full the box is, your per port cost is still $125+ per port higher than
the PM 3.

~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~
Jake Messinger, VP. ph:713-772-6690 Lucent Dealer
AMS, Inc. fx:713-774-3498 Medical Billing
8300 Bissonnet #400 jake@ams.com , ICQ# 4403734 Internet Services
Houston, Texas 77074 www.ams.com/~jake and Hardware

Adjunct Professor University of Houston, CBA jake@uh.edu
~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~

INVENTOR OF the _.,-*~''~*-,._ SQUIGGLES (c) 1978

-
To unsubscribe, email 'majordomo@livingston.com' with
'unsubscribe portmaster-users' in the body of the message.
Searchable list archive: <URL:http://www.livingston.com/Tech/archive/>