(PM) RADIUS Question, but don't shoot. (fwd)

MegaZone (megazone@megazone.org)
Fri, 19 Feb 1999 12:16:31 -0800 (PST)

Once upon a time alex@nac.net shaped the electrons to say...
>Do not reply that this is a 'portmaster-radius' question, because it has
>nothing to do with the RADIUS server. This is a Radius-on-PM3 implentation

Actually check the RFCs, this is a question for RADIUS in general.

>access-reply packet is different than that of the ip address of "set auth
>x.x.x.x" ?

YES! In fact any client that does NOT would not be RFC compliant.
Any reply received by a RADIUS client that did NOT come from the IP
the client send the Access-Request to is sliently discarded. This is
a security measure to prevent a false reply from being injected. Yes,
it isn't perfect itself, but it is part of the overall package.

Any Access-Accept, Access-Reject, or Access-Challenge must have a source
address that was the destination address of the Access-Request.

Any Accounting-Response must have a source address that was the destination
address of the Accounting-Request.

-MZ

-- 
-=*X GOT CLUE? ISPF II - SAN DIEGO, CA 3/6-10 <URL:http://www.ispf.com/> X*=-
<URL:mailto:megazone@megazone.org> Gweep, Discordian, Author, Engineer, me..
Join ISP/C Internet Service Providers' Consortium <URL:http://www.ispc.org/>
"A little nonsense now and then, is relished by the wisest men" 781-788-0130
<URL:http://www.megazone.org/>  <URL:http://www.gweep.net/>  Hail Discordia!
-
To unsubscribe, email 'majordomo@livingston.com' with
'unsubscribe portmaster-users' in the body of the message.
Searchable list archive: <URL:http://www.livingston.com/Tech/archive/>