>It sure sounds like a lot of people are being short sighted because of modem
>problems today.
>I'm more than confident that Lucent's modem code will continue to improve,
>and that there will again be a point in time when they are on the rise
>and someone else is on the decline. Anyone who tries to jump back and forth
>in the NAS market based on changes like this will find themselves in trouble.
Well, since 3.7.2, I havent seen much improvment in terms of random
disconnects. Out of the total call volume, I see perhaps 80% proper
negotiated terminations. With 3.7.2, I would see perhaps 90%, however it
follows that it would increase since more people have PCM style modems.
normal 79.18% 50832/64198
User Request - Call Circuit Closed 11.91% 7649/64198
Lost Carrier 8.16% 5238/64198
User Error - PPP NCP Active to Request 0.52% 335/64198
User Request - PPP Term Ack 0.10% 66/64198
Port Error - Exceeded LAPM retransmission limit 0.04% 24/64198
NAS Request - PPP Maximum Retransmissions 0.04% 24/64198
Service Unavailable - Failed to detect V.42 remote 0.03% 17/64198
Service Unavailable - PPP No Protocol 0.01% 6/64198
User Error - LAPM negotiation timeout 0.01% 4/64198
Port Error - DSP error 0.00% 1/64198
Lost Carrier - Waiting for Filter 0.00% 1/64198
No Event Identified 0.00% 1/64198
Where you are, you use Ascend. How do the statistics compare ?
---Mike
Mike Tancsa (mdtancsa@sentex.net)
Sentex Communications Corp,
Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
-
To unsubscribe, email 'majordomo@livingston.com' with
'unsubscribe portmaster-users' in the body of the message.
Searchable list archive: <URL:http://www.livingston.com/Tech/archive/>