PM3's in their current form, with the current OS issues are PIECES OF SHIT
Ours needs to be rebooted several times a day, after the ethernet
interface stops working.
Lucent dont give a damn about the problems, in fact, they dont even seem
to think anyone outside the US uses their product.
I have gone from being a Lucent fan, to regretting I ever purchased any of
their term servers. You may have to pay for IOS updates sometimes, but at
least cisco will fix their damn bugs.
Lucent/lucent people - get off your collective asses, and fix the damn
problems that exist with the PM range of terminal servers.
No doubt, Lucent will continue to ignore the problems that people are
having - and will see their terminal server market share dwindle.
BTW, an email response from a Lucent drone telling me to call an
international number during US office hours is NOT a suitable response to
a client that has purchased over AUD$250,000 worth of their equipment.
If only Livingston had never sold out to Lucent..........
frustrated,
Gary Allpike
On Tue, 2 Feb 1999, Robert Hanson wrote:
> both the max line and the pm3/4 line will die IN FAVOR OF CISCO END TO END
> if something isnt done about the quality and speed of developement of
> COMOS/modem code etc blah ***and*** various PM4 blades...
>
> On Tue, 2 Feb 1999, Jake Messinger wrote:
> > So anyway... to keep it on topic. How many of you think the Max will go
> > away, versus how many of you think the Pm 3 will go away?
> > Jake Messinger, VP. ph:713-772-6690 Lucent Dealer
-
To unsubscribe, email 'majordomo@livingston.com' with
'unsubscribe portmaster-users' in the body of the message.
Searchable list archive: <URL:http://www.livingston.com/Tech/archive/>