Dave
===================================================
I N T E R N E T F O R B U S I N E S S
Mercury Network http://www.tm.net/
129 Ashman St / P O Box 117 Voice: 517-837-3790
Midland, MI 48640-0117 Fax: 517-837-3780
===================================================
-----Original Message-----
From: Vernon Burke <vburke@skow.net>
To: Blaz Zupan <blaz@gold.amis.net>; Christopher Masto <chris@netmonger.net>
Cc: portmaster-users@livingston.com <portmaster-users@livingston.com>
Date: Sunday, February 07, 1999 10:03 AM
Subject: Re: (PM) UPDATE: Fast Busies on PM3
>Blaz:
> I loaded up 3.7.2c4 on my PM2e-30 a couple of days ago. Nothing
>jumps right out as a large change but it certainly hasn't broken anything.
>It seems like we asked for details enough times about it, SOMEONE
>in the know should be able to explain it. Then again, the web site still
>says 3.8 is the highest release for the PM3. :P
>
>Vern
>
>
>
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: Blaz Zupan <blaz@gold.amis.net>
>To: Christopher Masto <chris@netmonger.net>
>Cc: <portmaster-users@livingston.com>
>Sent: Sunday, February 07, 1999 9:22 AM
>Subject: Re: (PM) UPDATE: Fast Busies on PM3
>
>
>>On Sat, 6 Feb 1999, Christopher Masto wrote:
>>> That's the end of my little rant. The PM3 does a pretty decent job,
>>> and if you turn on massive amounts of debugging, and spend a few days
>>> figuring out what it means and tracking down the relevant
>>> documentation, you can actually get a lot of that info.. but I can't
>>
>>Yes, that's exactly how I feel as well. On this list we can often see
>>praise of ComOS, because "it is so easy to configure". Yes it is, but when
>>you have a problem, it is HARD to debug, because you don't have as much
>>information as you could.
>>
>>I hate to mention it, but yes, Cisco IOS can be sometimes hard to use, but
>>you really can't beat the amount of information it can give you when you
>>have a problem. With ComOS, you have to argue on this list (and rfe as
>>much as you like) before your face gets red and you give up...
>>
>>The most simple example: which port uses which B channel? With the
>>officialy documented commands, you can't find it out. Luckily somebody
>>found the "munich" commands, which DO display this information. What is
>>the problem with making a public command out of it???? Or why doesn't the
>>B channel actually correspond to the S port (B channel 5 is S5)? I haven't
>>heard a convincing argument yet, except for "it would be hard to
>>implement".
>>
>>Another simple example: after more then 1 year of waiting, a ComOS 3.7.2c4
>>for PM2's appears on the FTP site. Why is there no documentation for it?
>>Why does no Lucent employee want to comment on it here (even a "somebody
>>goofed and shouldn't have put it up there in the first place" would be
>>just fine).
>>
>>Blaz Zupan, blaz@medinet.si, http://home.amis.net/blaz
>>Medinet d.o.o., Linhartova 21, 2000 Maribor, Slovenia
>>
>>-
>>To unsubscribe, email 'majordomo@livingston.com' with
>>'unsubscribe portmaster-users' in the body of the message.
>>Searchable list archive: <URL:http://www.livingston.com/Tech/archive/>
>>
>>
>
>-
>To unsubscribe, email 'majordomo@livingston.com' with
>'unsubscribe portmaster-users' in the body of the message.
>Searchable list archive: <URL:http://www.livingston.com/Tech/archive/>
-
To unsubscribe, email 'majordomo@livingston.com' with
'unsubscribe portmaster-users' in the body of the message.
Searchable list archive: <URL:http://www.livingston.com/Tech/archive/>