Re: (PM) isdn switch type with chanT1

Thomas Kinnen (tkinnen@livingston.com)
Fri, 05 Feb 1999 09:59:58 -0800

Robert Hanson wrote:

> also, i have been told by the dms-500 techs that when they setup chanT1's
> or PRI's to any isp in our area that they use
> immediate wink instead of E&M Wink since we really dont need to pass extra
> digits etc etc...
> is that a good idea for them to be doing that with someone that has
> chanT1's or PRIs?
> i wouldnt think it would make any difference myself.

No, the switch type does not affect CT1 operation.

----
Thomas C Kinnen - <tkinnen@livingston.com> <tkinnen@ra.lucent.com>
"All of the opinions stated above are my own and not my employer's,
unless they were given to me by my employer"
-
To unsubscribe, email 'majordomo@livingston.com' with
'unsubscribe portmaster-users' in the body of the message.
Searchable list archive: <URL:http://www.livingston.com/Tech/archive/>