I second that. The ISDN-OR *needs* to get NAT! The number of times I'd
much perfer to go with Livingston, but instead have to get something else
because of this one feature not there is growing. With IP space getting
tight by the day from ARIN (and having to pay for it), many of us prefer
to go the 1 IP method. It's usually easier and for the most part the end
user that's doing typical stuff doesn't need to have IPs routed to them.
Please get this done!
> INVENTOR OF the _.,-*~''~*-,._ SQUIGGLES (c) 1978
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, email 'majordomo@livingston.com' with
> 'unsubscribe portmaster-users' in the body of the message.
> Searchable list archive: <URL:http://www.livingston.com/Tech/archive/>
>
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Robert Du Gaue - rdugaue@calweb.com http://www.calweb.com
President, CalWeb Internet Services Inc. (916) 641-9320
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
To unsubscribe, email 'majordomo@livingston.com' with
'unsubscribe portmaster-users' in the body of the message.
Searchable list archive: <URL:http://www.livingston.com/Tech/archive/>