Re: (PM) OSPF ranges

Scott Lampert (scott@ioa.com)
Sun, 8 Nov 1998 17:48:53 -0500

On Sat, Nov 07, 1998 at 11:33:07AM -0700, Doug Ingraham wrote:
> On Sat, 7 Nov 1998, Jason Lixfeld wrote:
>
> > Both. You set up the area and then you set up 2 range statements. One
> > for the ether and one for the assigned poool. You can do the aggregate
> > /16 or a /24 or whatever.
>
> You don't need a range for the assigned address pool. It doesn't seem to
> hurt you if you put one in but it isn't used for anything.
>
>
> Doug Ingraham You can judge the quality of your life by how often
> Rapid City, SD you notice the enjoyment of the little things.
> USA

It will determine whether the assigned pool is announced as an OSPF
route or an OSPF type 2 external route. This doesn't seem to work for networks
that show up dynamically, like one set up through the radius users file
however. Go figure.
-Scott

-- 
+-----------------------+--------------------------------+
| Scott Lampert         | Systems Administrator          |
| scott@ioa.com         | Internet of Asheville          |
|(828) 687-8848 Ext 310 | http://www.ioa.com             |
+-----------------------+--------------------------------+
-
To unsubscribe, email 'majordomo@livingston.com' with
'unsubscribe portmaster-users' in the body of the message.
Searchable list archive: <URL:http://www.livingston.com/Tech/archive/>