Yes, likely once all of the major issues are worked out on the PM-3.
It is more managable to do it on one major product, get it stable, then
do the residual testing on the other products.
>Does anyone know when Lucent will implement router based L2TP? I am very
I believe this is in closed beta now. Also in closed beta is IPIP tunnels
and IPSec (on the PM-3, with the Accelerator card).
>Other features which appear to be missing and are commonly available in SOHO
>routers are NAT and passthrough (where all incoming connections irrespective
>of IP address are sent to a nominated IP address.) You can do this and more
>in the Bay Clam routers.
NAT/NAPT is in closed beta currently.
Can you clarify what passthrough does? I'm thinking you mean the ability
to redirect packets to another machine, like a cache server, based on port.
So all web (port 80) requests are automatically routed to your web cache
box. I believe their NAT/NAPT implementation allows for this.
>What about HTTP setup interfaces?
Not going to happen. They debated using HTTP or a Java based tool - and
picked the Java solution as more flexible, robust, and feature capable.
That's PMVision.
-MZ
-- <URL:mailto:megazone@megazone.org> Gweep, Discordian, Author, Engineer, me.. Join ISP/C Internet Service Providers' Consortium <URL:http://www.ispc.org/> "A little nonsense now and then, is relished by the wisest men" 781-788-0130 <URL:http://www.gweep.net/> <URL:http://www.megazone.org/> Hail Discordia! - To unsubscribe, email 'majordomo@livingston.com' with 'unsubscribe portmaster-users' in the body of the message. Searchable list archive: <URL:http://www.livingston.com/Tech/archive/>