Re: (PM) L2TP

Tom (tom@sdf.com)
Mon, 13 Jul 1998 14:07:54 -0700 (PDT)

On Mon, 13 Jul 1998, Jake Messinger wrote:

> > > What about mlppp on async ports?
> >
> > Not applicable to PM2 or OR
>
> Why not? Its applicable in win 95 on async ports.

Because PM2 will not do async MLPPP. I guess _maybe_ the OR-M could
support async MLPPP.

> >
> > > What about assigning multiple ip #'s to the ethernet interface?
> >
> > Possibly applicable to the PM2 or OR, if they will be supporting it.
>
> Of course its applicable. Otherwise why would Cisco and Ascend allow it.
> You mean possibly they will add it?

Uncertain whether those products will get those features. So far only
the IRX and PM3 are known for sure to get multi address support for
ethernet.

> ~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~
> Jake Messinger ph:713-772-6690 Lucent Dealer
> AMS, Inc. fx:713-774-3498 Medical Billing
> 8300 Bissonnet #400 jake@ams.com Internet Services
> Houston, Texas 77074 www.ams.com/~jake Business Management
> ~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~
>
>
>

Tom

-
To unsubscribe, email 'majordomo@livingston.com' with
'unsubscribe portmaster-users' in the body of the message.
Searchable list archive: <URL:http://www.livingston.com/Tech/archive/>