Re: (PM) Which router to use for BGP-4?

Frank Peters (fwp@net.msstate.edu)
Sat, 4 Jul 1998 08:24:05 -0500 (CDT)

On Sat, 4 Jul 1998, Chad Scott wrote:

> On 3 Jul 1998, Tom wrote:
> > A 3640 is rated to handle 50 kpps. But you need to make sure the router
> > doesn't bury itself (over buffering) when interfaces get maxed.
>
> 50 kpps? 50,000 pps? What type of interfaces do you have on this 3640,
> OC12? That's *ALOT* of packets per second.

As he said, the problem is when interfaces get maxed.

Suppose someone coming in over your T1 smurfs the broadcast address of a
busy ethernet. Now you've got 1.5mb of incoming echo requests and as much
as 10mb worth of outgoing echo replies.

Its while your cisco does its best to deliver 10mb of traffic out a
saturated 1.5mb pipe that things can get problematic.

Of course, as has been mentioned elsewhere, this is fairly easy to
prevent. There isn't much reason for something outside to be sending
packets to an internal broadcast address, so just drop them.

-- Frank Peters Mississippi State University Systems and Networks
-- fwp at net.msstate.edu +1 (601) 325-0741 FAX: +1 (601) 325-8921

-
To unsubscribe, email 'majordomo@livingston.com' with
'unsubscribe portmaster-users' in the body of the message.
Searchable list archive: <URL:http://www.livingston.com/Tech/archive/>