> I agree. Priority should have been given to just adding the
> v.90 support, which apparantly works more or less ok. The problem
> is the revamp of the v.34 modem code which broke it and keeps us
> from offering v.90 to our customers. I wish they would just plug
> the old v.34 code back in and do an interim release, but I don't
> know if this is technically feasible or not.
The V.34 problems are probably a result of the V.90 additions, not
intentional changes to V.34.
To get V.90 to work, the initial negotiation sequence I'm sure has to be
changed, and they may have inadvertantly broken V.34 along the way.
Brian
-
To unsubscribe, email 'majordomo@livingston.com' with
'unsubscribe portmaster-users' in the body of the message.
Searchable list archive: <URL:http://www.livingston.com/Tech/archive/>