> Our network equipment supplier told us that the router added to the one
> PM-2e doesn't have enough capacity (??) to handle that many connections
The R wan port is supposed to be able to handle 80 serial connections of
average traffic, maybe average traffic has gone up. Sounds like you are
suffering from the wan port problem then...
> and that we should get an
external router to replace it. We have
> purrchased and plan to install a Cisco 2501 router. (Diagrams below)
Why would you purchase a Cisco 2501 when you are a Livingston user and
Livingston makes the OR-HS for way under $1000 which can handle a full t1,
and also the IRX-111 which is a larger Cisco-like model?
> 1. My questions is: does all this make sense?
If you like Livingston, stick with Livingston, get the Livingston router.
> 2. Could the base10 ethernet that connects all this together be the
> bottleneck?
I think its prolly your wan port.
> Any input would be appreciated.
Put in a support call to Livingston Tech support to see what they
suggest/recommend.
~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~
Jake Messinger ph:713-772-6690 Lucent Dealer
AMS, Inc. fx:713-774-3498 Medical Billing
8300 Bissonnet #400 jake@ams.com Internet Services
Houston, Texas 77074 www.ams.com/~jake Business Management
~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~
-
To unsubscribe, email 'majordomo@livingston.com' with
'unsubscribe portmaster-users' in the body of the message.
Searchable list archive: <URL:http://www.livingston.com/Tech/archive/>