>
>
> On Fri, 19 Jun 1998, PM User wrote:
>
> > Or to avoid the load on the router, do the ip assignment as below and have
> > the PM route it directly to a web server that will give up the same message.
>
> AFAIK, PM's can't do a "set next-hop" command. So your above statement
> would be wrong.
To be more precise, you need to separate and *route* traffic based on
source address. The PM can't do this, and the only way to do it with a
cisco is to policy route all packets matching the criteria in the policy
map.
Regards,
Stavros Patiniotis
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-System Administrator / Network Manager Escape.Net -
- 465b South Rd -
-email: stavros@esc.net.au Keswick SA 5035 -
-URL: http://www.esc.net.au Ph 82932526 Fax 82932949-
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
To unsubscribe, email 'majordomo@livingston.com' with
'unsubscribe portmaster-users' in the body of the message.
Searchable list archive: <URL:http://www.livingston.com/Tech/archive/>