RE: (PM) PM4

Mikael Hugo (mikael.hugo@dataphone.net)
Thu, 18 Jun 1998 02:10:18 +0200

Taking it back is a bad option. They probably dont have E1 PM3s enough
to replace it with immidiatly. We are going with a fully equipped unit.

We mght be able to sneak it into the contract, and do something legal
around it but its more fun if it works.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Damon Warren [SMTP:damon@oneimage.com]
> Sent: Thursday, June 18, 1998 1:56 AM
> To: Mikael Hugo; portmaster-users@livingston.com
> Subject: Re: (PM) PM4
>
> I have not seen one, but I'm sure Lucent will take it back if it does
> not
> work ;)
>
> -Damon Warren (damon@oneimage.com)
> -Network Systems Administrator
> -ImageNet, Inc. (www.oneimage.com)
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mikael Hugo <mikael.hugo@dataphone.net>
> To: portmaster-users@livingston.com <portmaster-users@livingston.com>
> Date: Wednesday, June 17, 1998 5:55 PM
> Subject: (PM) PM4
>
>
> >
> >Has anyone seen one of these beasts in action.
> >
> >We want to implement our first in August and reaching three units by
> the
> >end of the year, but its a lot of money to pump out if it doesent
> work.
> >
> >
> >Regards
> >
> >Mikael Hugo
> >Dataphone communication Networks
> >-
> >To unsubscribe, email 'majordomo@livingston.com' with
> >'unsubscribe portmaster-users' in the body of the message.
> >Searchable list archive:
> <URL:http://www.livingston.com/Tech/archive/>
> >
-
To unsubscribe, email 'majordomo@livingston.com' with
'unsubscribe portmaster-users' in the body of the message.
Searchable list archive: <URL:http://www.livingston.com/Tech/archive/>