(PM) RE: Piece of Junk.....

Matt Boyle (mboyle@exchange.netexp.net)
Thu, 11 Jun 1998 15:17:01 -0400

Users:

come on.. PM'3s are not bad... Ive seen and had some limited experence
with a USR TCS, they are a pain to get working, you can take a good ol'
PM3'er out of the box stick it in a rack, plug it in and basically your
up and running in a few minutes.. minus any TEleco Issues.....

I am not saying USR are not good but PM3 should get credit, and when
V.90 comes out i bet it really will be stable... Give Lucinston a break
and let em' work... Sure I know the pains of no stable v.90 but I also
know that their working the best on it...

This is my personal opinion... ohh yeah and with my Analog 33.6k modem
I get the best connection into a PM3 a 31,200 connection, with USR's,
ascends etc... Ive only had in the past 26,400.....

Matt

-----Original Message-----
From: Mark Peugeot [mailto:mark@ptw.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 11, 1998 2:59 PM
To: mike@integrityonline11.com
Cc: portmaster-users@livingston.com
Subject: Re: (PM) Top 5 Uses For a Portmaster 3

Hey... I'll trade you for a USR total control chassis.

Mark

>
> 1. Nothing
> 2. Art
> 3. Paper weight
> 4. Boat anchor
> 5. Garbage can
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, email 'majordomo@livingston.com' with
> 'unsubscribe portmaster-users' in the body of the message.
> Searchable list archive: <URL:http://www.livingston.com/Tech/archive/>
>

-
To unsubscribe, email 'majordomo@livingston.com' with
'unsubscribe portmaster-users' in the body of the message.
Searchable list archive: <URL:http://www.livingston.com/Tech/archive/>

-
To unsubscribe, email 'majordomo@livingston.com' with
'unsubscribe portmaster-users' in the body of the message.
Searchable list archive: <URL:http://www.livingston.com/Tech/archive/>