Re: (PM) PMVision Suite of Tools

Robert Boyle (robert@garden.net)
Mon, 08 Jun 1998 16:00:56 -0400

At 11:32 AM 6/8/98 -0400, you wrote:
>>What machine are you running Amber on?
>
>Alpha PC164 - 500 MHz, 256 MB RAM running Linux. Nothing else running...
>
>Also tried on Windows NT Workstation Pentium 233 MMX with 64 MB RAM.
>Nothing else running...

That's what you need to boot NT! ,) <g>

>I guess I need MORE horsepower than that?
>
>I do agree however that speed is subjective, when comparing a C program
>to Java, it is slower -> REALLY! Even Sun admits that, then tries to
>pooh-pooh it by saying new JIT techology "may" make the Java app faster.

Is Amber ever going to be available in a .class file? I know _nothing_
about programming in Java, but I do know that Microsoft's JVM is at least
2-3 times faster than Sun's. If I could use MS's runtime, that would be
very nice. Unfortunately, it doesn't seem to understand .jar files. No,
this is not intended to start a debate about purejava vs. msjava, win32 vs.
other platforms, etc... This is simply a statement that on the Win32
platform, MS's JRE is far faster than Sun. On my PII-266Mhz w/ 128MB RAM
Amber's performance is acceptable, but the menus and a few other functions
aren't as snappy as I would like, but I imagine that after Lucent is done
implementing their list of required features this will improve. Overall, I
am VERY impressed with the quantum leap in functionality and features that
Amber makes over it's predecessor. :)

-Robert

Robert Boyle Server Co-location,
Garden Networks Internet Access,
50 Diller Ave Development & Consulting
Newton, NJ 07860 (973)300-9211 Ext.103
8AM-8PM Mon-Fri EST http://www.garden.net
Lucent RABU & Software.Com Post.Office VAR

-
To unsubscribe, email 'majordomo@livingston.com' with
'unsubscribe portmaster-users' in the body of the message.
Searchable list archive: <URL:http://www.livingston.com/Tech/archive/>