Re: (PM) PM3 as replacement for Cisco 2501?

Josh Richards (jrichard@livingston.com)
Fri, 29 May 1998 11:56:33 -0700 (PDT)

On 29 May 1998, Tim Winders wrote:

> I have a remote location that has a T1 going from our central site to
> it. On the remote site I have a Cisco 2501 connected to the T1 and the
> the local ethernet. We are only routing IP (using RIP I for now). The
> unit/DSU or something is acting up on me. Is the PM3 (no modem cards) a
> valid replacement for the 2501? I just want to connect it to a T1 (not
> channelized) and to the ethernet and route IP using RIP I. The central
> site has a BayNetworks router and we are running a simple PPP connection
> over the sync line.

Yes, no problem.

-jr

----
Josh Richards - <jrichard@livingston.com> - <josh@lucent.com>
[Beta Engineer] - LUCENT Technologies - Remote Access Business Unit
<URL:http://www.livingston.com/> * <URL:http://www.lucent.com/dns/>

-
To unsubscribe, email 'majordomo@livingston.com' with
'unsubscribe portmaster-users' in the body of the message.
Searchable list archive: <URL:http://www.livingston.com/Tech/archive/>