Re: (PM) PM3 vs. PacWest

Rick Wagner (rick@foothill.net)
Sat, 09 May 1998 07:48:24 -0700

I see it another way. Maybe its not the PM3 or configuration.
If you or your customers are getting fast busy signals this could represent
ALL PATHS BUSY. PacWest may not have enough trunk groups or lines betwen
the local telco and themselves to carry your traffic.

Rick Wagner

At 07:22 AM 5/9/98 -0700, you wrote:
>
>We recently decided to try the PacWest Co-location service in
>Oakland using our PM3's and their Telco service. We have two
>Pm3's running ComOS 3.8b15 connected to them via 4 CT1
>lines. The encoding is AMI, framing D4, PCM: u-law, signaling
>E&M winkstart. All works fine for 3 modems on each PM, then
>we (our customers) get fast busy. PacWest says the portmasters
>aren't winking back after three connections so the lines
>are busied out, I say fast busy's would point to the telco. In
>any case, they claim it's the equipment, I suspect it's them,
>my customers don't care who's fault it is, they just want it to
>work. Has anyone else seen this? Does anyone have a clue
>or experience with PacWest and Portmasters?
>
>thanks,
>
>jim
>
>
>-
>To unsubscribe, email 'majordomo@livingston.com' with
>'unsubscribe portmaster-users' in the body of the message.
>Searchable list archive: <URL:http://www.livingston.com/Tech/archive/>
>
>

-
To unsubscribe, email 'majordomo@livingston.com' with
'unsubscribe portmaster-users' in the body of the message.
Searchable list archive: <URL:http://www.livingston.com/Tech/archive/>